Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="sunirico, post: 5380220, member: 131055"]
I was just asking for proof since you claimed that "no scientific data" exist. If you are referring to "scientific data" I was hoping you were coming from the empirical sciences but as I assumed instead you rely on hypotheses and attempt to ridicule anyone expecting any proof. Also an age old trick called a straw man.

We live in a day and age where theories are taken as fact in the face of contradicting evidence of the contrary. Global acceptance (note we're way past consensus it's become unquestionable) of stories, even wider accepted than any one religion, made up by very intelligent people which can even be supported by mathematical equations yet lacks any observable experience.

When you mentioned "scientific data" I was hoping that you'd actually have something that involved careful observation, applying rigorous skepticism about what is observed, given that cognitive assumptions can distort how one interprets the observation. That your hypothesis was formulated, via induction, based on such observations; experimental and measurement-based testing. Hoping that you can show these deductions (data) which can be drawn from the hypothesis.

My sincerest apologies if this was seen as an attempt to defy our holiest common knowledge. It's not personal only science, but if we continue to accept peer reviewed nonsense as facts, which I am not saying your article is, it will certainly effect our future generations on a very personal level. But hey who cares about proof right.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us