US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
How Bad does a beat have to be to be a bad beat?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Four Dogs, post: 1287420, member: 2668"] IMO none of these things are in themselves bad beats. To me a bad beat needs to meet certain requirements. 1) You are ahead in the hand and lose. That one is obvious. 2) You're opponent should have reasonably assumed that you were ahead but either through inexperience or indifference continues in the hand. You must remember that bluffing and situation reading are part of the game. If an opponent has good reason to believe that you'll fold to a rr or a shove and he just happens to run into the high end of your range but sucks out anyway, that is not a bad beat. 3) Your opponent does not have the odds, implied or direct, to continue with the hand and again should have understood this. 4) Your opponent must have no other reasonable considerations for continuing with the hand but does so anyway. This applies mostly to tournament situations where sometimes pot odds are less important than say Utility Odds ([url="http://www.amazon.com/Poker-Tournament-Formula-II-Strategies/dp/1580422268"]Arnold Schneider[/url]). Your opponent may feel that just barely making the money is an unnacceptable use of his time and taking seemingly ill-advised risks will give him a better shot at a meaningfull cash or that the blinds are so high and they are so short stacked that they are basically pot committed before the hand even starts. 5)Anything that occurs after the last relevant action by either party is meaningless. If your all-in with T9 and called by AK, you may flop a T and be way ahead but lose to a K on the river despite the fact that you held a 75% advantage with 2 cards to come. Again, not a Bad Beat. Long and short. You're opponent needs to be a complete bonehead. By the definitions above it would be nearly immpossible for any good poker player to ever dish out a bad beat. There are always good reasons behind the actions they take. Whenever I suffer a particularly painfull loss I always think back and try to put myself in my opponents shoes. What was my table image? Have I played this person before? What was his chip stack? What were his options? Did the benefits of winning the hand outweigh the harm? When you take all this into account instances of genuinely honest bad beats is really quite small. Poker is a complicated game, it's rarely ever as simple as My Aces lost to his Deuces. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
How Bad does a beat have to be to be a bad beat?
Top