Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="RamdeeBen, post: 1745250, member: 71146"] That's irrelevant though and doesn't base anything on varience just because no limit would end quicker than a limit game. This is because people can't bet more (go all-in) in limit so it would be slower for everyones stacks to dwindle. Now, as for variance, you have Aces 100 times in limit and 100 times in no limit. Which one is more is likely to take down pots on the flop/turn/river more often than not? No limit of course, in limit, someone will call down with any draw down to the river, meaning chances are they are more likely to hit because they wouldn't of bailed out earlier because of pots odds therefore limit has more variance. The only difference is, you can't really bust yourself as quick in the limit game. [/QUOTE]