US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Ingorance and simplyfying - why is the word fish used?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="flint, post: 1312607, member: 21908"] I have been thinking about this lately - why do some people call other players fish? I find that a lot of players will call other players names like fish when they loose against a player when the other player makes an unusual move or a negative EV play. On the other hand I have heard good players use words such as aggro loose fish, which in my mind is a little better cause it has other words beside the fish. :D Still, I think that the word fish should be eliminated from your thinking. The biggest downside is that it just drains energy from the most important tasks at hand which is beating the other player. This is where the ignorance and simplyfying come in. You are ignorant to see the plays he is making because you have pigeonholed him into being a fish. Even the worst players in the world can make decent moves sometimes so ignoring aspects such as different levels of his game can be quite problematic. The "fishy" player might just be playing bad on that day, but since you were ignorant that he was playing bad, the next time you play against the better game of that player you will have problems adjusting. Simplyfying goes hand in hand with ignorance. When you pigeon hole a player, there might be trouble later on. Forexample if you don't see that the "fishy" player is playing so loose and aggressive is beacuse he is on a upswing and doesn't normally play that loose then you might have problems adjusting later. And then if your thinking is : "This guy is a fish, I should be able to beat him", you are not seeing things clearly and wasting your energy when your thinking should be "I am loosing money against this guy, how should I adjust?". Lastly I think this is part of a bigger topic of looking at things objectively. I am a fan of being objective at the poker table. One example of this is note taking, someone might write that a player is a "super fish" when he raises from UTG with 86os, but the thing is that isn't really going to help you as much as just objectively writing in what he did. I would love to hear some comments on this and I will try to get my 500th post special writing up soon as well. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Ingorance and simplyfying - why is the word fish used?
Top