US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Interesting Rule Dilemma
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="detroitjunkie, post: 3150297, member: 61462"] No, solely based on the fact that wrong information was given and that caused the muck - it is unfair, and is a major angle -and if you speak of intent of poker rules - this is why they exist, to stop this type (and all types) of angle to be played here, they are meant to protect those from the shady (even if it wasnt the intent, which here it was not, but that doesnt change anything), a lot poker rules are anti-angle and anti-collusion, the others are to make sure players are paying attention, which yes this person was not, so he could get a penalty for mucking early, but not a dead hand. No matter what your buddy thought he was drawing to, the fact remains he misinformed about his hand, essentially at showdown because he didnt make a bet (?). If your friend had bet (which you never said he did), or there was a draw to come, its a whole different story (you say he called - was there a bet after last draw?) also opponent showed his hand - there is no way a dealer is allowed to award a pot to an obvious loser, no way, of course unless there was a bet the rules are meant to make the game fair and honest, which the outcome here was, now it also makes the game need attentive players - however when people break the rules they do not lose pots unfairly, they get penalties, otherwise the newbies would never play live now, even if there was a bet, a case can be made that your friend was angling, which could still result in the same outcome, depends on the floor, and especially if your friend had done this action before (doesnt sound like it though) in the same tourney and was warned, though in this case your friend probably would have been removed from the tourney altogether. tricky situation - if there was a bet I would award pot to your friend (if this was his first infraction) and then issue him a penalty, if not then the other guy gets the pot As soon as the guy showed the jacks I would have just bet without saying anything and watch him fold, this would have not been an angle. Expensive lesson. What was the outcome, did either of these players win the sat? (I assume your friend did not) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Interesting Rule Dilemma
Top