Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="zachvac, post: 1204866, member: 26306"]
But the thing I'm saying is unless we are already 3-betting SCs 100% in that spot and need more hands to 3-bet, there's no point in doing it with PPs. It's as if for some reason you could only raise 1% of hands preflop and someone told you "I'd mix in 99+/AQ+". They'd be crazy, you just raise AA/KK 100% of the time. Similarly I didn't pokerstove it but I imagine the value 3-bet range combined with all SCs comes out to much more than 20% and I don't know too many people even in a specific spot that 3-bet more than 20%. So there's no reason to include a hand that is less +ev (assuming ATC might even be +ev as long as we keep the frequency down) and remove the one that's more profitable. See what I'm saying?

edit: and as for balance we can still rep plenty of value hands on the flop no matter what so like 345 flop we don't have to have 33-55 in our range to rep sets because we 3-bet QQ+ for value and get those in on 345 flop so we can rep those as essentially nut hands in that spot.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us