US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Killer Poker Online
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="jdeliverer, post: 1219853, member: 38411"] Just read this recently, just wanted to get some others' thoughts on it. Here are mine: 1. It was mostly pretty boring. I felt throughout the whole thing like I was waiting to get to the 'good part'. 2. I think some of Vorhaus' ideas may be outdated. He is a huge fan of keeping very detailed book on every player. I think the need for this has gone down sharply with the widespread use of HUD's. 3. This sort of stems from 2. He is VERY against multitabling. He doesn't seem to realize the actual purpose of multitabling: to increase profits. He simply assumes that people only multitable because they are bored, which is clearly not a valid assumption. 4. The book seemed to be pretty repetitive. It just felt like he didn't produce enough new ideas to fill a full book, so he added pointless anecdotes to add pages. I know this is pretty critical, but I am only presenting the negative thoughts I had here. Obviously I didn't particularly like it, but there were a couple things I learned. Maybe the problem was that I was more looking for a strategy book geared towards online players, while this book was about online play. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Killer Poker Online
Top