US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Limping/Calling
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="F Paulsson, post: 378431, member: 6979"] Alright, let's see if I can tackle this question a bit better than just saying "don't do it." First, allow me to rephrase your question to what I believe you actually mean: [I]What's the worst possible starting hand that can still be played profitably given optimum conditions?[/I] To answer that, I'll revert back to my answer above: Suited connectors gain in value against many opponents, and non suited-connectors like shorthanded pots. I think it's easier, then, if we separate the two: [B]Suited connectors[/B] Given optimum conditions - a full table where everyone limps in and I know there will be no raise - I will play 32s. I won't flop a straight or a flush very often, but when I do, the pot will make up for small bets I pay to get there. Especially if I get the nut straight; whoever is holding an ace will pay me off dearly. So when it comes to suited connectors, I could go all the way down. [B]Non-suited non-connectors[/B] A non-suited, non-connector wants to play heads-up, for largest chance to win. So, to fabricate a heads-up situation where you haven't already gotten a discount in the form of a blind, let's say that you're on the button in a limit hold'em tournament, the small blind is in the bathroom, and you know that the big blind never raises preflop, and never folds preflop. These conditions are important, because we're looking for the optimum: If he could fold preflop, you should play weaker hands yet for a raise, because you have some steal equity. If he could raise preflop, you should tighten up, because you don't want your marginal hands to have to pay two bets to see the flop. What's the worst hand you should play here? The hand that's in the 51st percentile - the hand that figures to be [I]just better[/I] than his average hand. I'm not sure exactly where this line goes, but I'll guess it's somewhere around J8o. Given that both of these scenarios are hypothetical and not actually applicable to just about any decision you'll ever actually make, I feel compelled to add this: Why do you ask? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Limping/Calling
Top