US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Logic or intuition?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Marcos1315, post: 6317469, member: 479573"] I would say I think it's a combination, but I don't know. I would give an example about raising from UTG. The logic is to raise from UTG with very good hands. So, if you think the UTG player has a really good hand, you're going to fold everything that isn't a very good hand. This makes his raise automatically profitable, because you're going to fold a lot (I don't know if it would really be profitable, it depends on the bet size too, but I think it would be). So, by logic, you would lose money. But to counter that would be logic, not intuition. I studied decision making in college and the difference between deliberate and intuitive decisions. Intuitive decisions are more accurate in some ways because only the most fundamental information is considered to make a decision. One study found that people better predicted NBA outcomes using intuitive decisions (vs. the group that had to come up with an explanation and predict the outcome), likely because they started thinking of less influential things in the outcome, or gave equal weight to different aspects. For example, when you look at the schedule and you see Knicks vs. Nets, you say Nets. If you start to analyze a lot, you can see that the Nets were playing in Los Angeles, so they might be tired, and you say, oh, I think the Knicks take this one. While this travel information is relevant, Kevin Durant carries more weight in determining the winner than the distance of the travel. That said, I think you have to deliberate a lot, mainly because it will improve your intuition. And there is a difference in the learning process. Explicit learning (reading things, watching videos, etc.) helps with deliberative decision making, and implicit learning (playing) further improves intuitive decision making. But implicit learning is not enough in more complex things (like poker). So you have to study (explicit learning) and play (implicit learning). And you will make deliberate and intuitive decisions. In the beginning you will deliberate a lot, make a lot of mistakes, but you will start to improve, understand things better and make more intuitive decisions. But intuitive decisions are not always better than deliberative decisions, so pay attention to this, so, with experience, you will understand at what points you should choose one or the other. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Logic or intuition?
Top