Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="feitr, post: 1140301, member: 34106"]
Hiya, have a couple of questions from ppl playing on "different sites" (ipokers, chuck plays prima?, zach plays UB?) How active are the HU tables there from nl200-nl1k? How good are the players at nl200+? I've decided that i am not going to play higher than nl1k, and will focus on playing 2 sites, anything from nl400-nl1k HU...so i need one more site to play. My default is pokerstars, but i won't get any rakeback there and the games aren't exactly poor compared to other sites. FT is a no-go since i can't get rakeback there and i hate them so much now i wouldn't even take it if given. One other thing to consider is that ipoker/prima, etc have higher rake for HU i think, so the games would have to be fairly weak to justify going there instead of pokerstars since 0 rakeback @ 50c rake = 50% rakeback @ $1 rake in midstakes. Also just out of curiousity, since i haven't really been keeping up with much poker-related lately, what ended up happening with UIGEA?

Party poker isn't bad once you get 200nl and above. Lots of reload bonuses/no deposit bonuses/promotions. I've pretty much had a constant stream of bonuses since i've played there, and if you get 5k points a month you are "guaranteed" 30% rakeback, which is pretty good and in reality should be substantially more than that since you can run your "big bonus" from your points for half that that which i think releases at >40% rakeback at like nl400 (and mb nl200). It is good for HU at least.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us