March prop bet for hands played, winrate

WVHillbilly said:

I actually think you're lazier than Combuboom

Click to expand...

how DARE you

ill lay $200 to your $150 for 60k hands, (and you are allowed to keep grinding past 60k if you havn't got the winrate high enough)

You can certainly keep playing beyond 60K as far as I'm concerned to reach the winrate required. I wonder how much I would have to pay Jared to tell you to play less???

combuboom said:

how DARE you

Click to expand...

It's not that I don't think you're lazy, you are. I just think Chuck's got you covered plus he's playing 6-max and going for more hands. Wait you're right, that's way too ambitious, I take it back Combu is the laziest!!

I'm not completely opposed to 4:3. Mainly because i forgot to mention that I've been practicing 8-tabling and feel surprisingly comfortable, even though I've been running like shit lately.

Even so, that's about 3.6 hours/day for me assuming I'm busy with Oma. That sounds both terrifying and exciting.

ChuckTs said:

I'm not completely opposed to 4:3. Mainly because i forgot to mention that I've been practicing 8-tabling and feel surprisingly comfortable, even though I've been running like shit lately.

Even so, that's about 3.6 hours/day for me assuming I'm busy with Oma. That sounds both terrifying and exciting.

Click to expand...

Hmmm 8-tabling huh? When are you planning on setting the exact terms? $100:$75 is, of course, also good for me.

Keep in mind my tilt problem (which is in the process of getting fixed but will never disappear). When I tilt 8-tabling, the affect on my winrate is doubled vs when I play 4 tables of course.

4:3 is ok, but 2:1 is of course better for me

OR we could even do what icemonkey suggested (or what I think he suggested) which is setting different odds for different landmarks, so to speak. That could of course change the winrate condition from any # of hands to strictly within the specific hand # landmarks.