US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
*** Mo' Money May Chat Thread ***
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="feitr, post: 1180475, member: 34106"] I was just thinking out loud moreorless. Basically, i used to be a litle paranoid about ppl bluffing me. I'd also make some spewy bluffs sometimes (bluffing w/ little to no equity in the pot), which would reinforce the idea that ppl can bluff in bad spots (since i was doing it). Net result is that i would often call down quite light, and pick off alot of bluffs (and also get owned sometimes). So once i fixed it and started to understand poker better, i think there is a tendency to assign similar thought processes to poorer players. For instance, it becomes a little hard to believe that somebody could just spaz out with only one overcard, because it is just such a horribly spewy play. But bad players don't think like this and don't make plays that make sense, so when something looks "odd" you probably shouldn't assign much logic to it (for ex. if villain shouldnt' be bluffing in a spot but they are betting, it probably means they are just running a horrible bluff rather than they are at the top of their range). Was in relation to switch talking about fish value betting bottom pair when you snap off a bluff w/ A high because they shouldn't have much they can bet on the river in that circumstance. It doesn't make the read any less correct than if villain showed up with air, it is just a situation where a fish is making a play that makes absolutely no sense - yet you are assigning sense to a player that is probably incapable of understanding logical poker processes. It's just something i have been thinking of as of late, as i think i've become a little too weak tight in the last while (probably as an overreaction to removing spew and partly as a reaction to constantly running into the top of everybody's ranges for > month) and giving ppl too much credit where it is not deserved. Far too much shitty thinking like "he can't rep much here so surely he wouldn't try to bluff" which definitely works vs good thinking players but is one level above where you should be against a poorer player (ie. they aren't repping much coz they suck at bluffing). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
*** Mo' Money May Chat Thread ***
Top