Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="RamdeeBen, post: 1813359, member: 71146"]
The worse the competition the lower the variance?

Really?

I understand the worse the competition the higher the ROI% but "variance" wise

So if we take on average most players in micros are bad players and lots like to play many hands.

If we have Aces the same amount of times in micros as well as higher limits, do you think Aces hold exactly the same based on the fact more people/more hands being involved in a pot? I know over the long haul Aces will win the same amount of time, but I think the percentage wise drops in a micro game purely because of the people involved in a hand.

The more people involved in a pot means your current hand has even less chance percentage wise to win right? If that's right then surely variance is higher because of the lower percentage?

If we get Aces AIPF vs approx 2 people on average (maybe 3) over long haul at micros and we get Aces in on average vs 1 person at a higher limit, that variance is going to be "lower"  at a micro level? I can't see how, if the percentage has dropped for Aces to win when vs more people then we are less likely to win the hand thus, more variance no?

By the way, I love debates like this. I'm usually wrong but when I get something in my head I love to hear what others opinions are.

I just thought the higher the percentage the less the variance and the lower the percentage the higher the variance..and if that is the case the micros are indeed more swingy and variance filled :p
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us