Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Grossberger, post: 1363635, member: 55797"] We are not saying anything about discussing the hand, that's against the rules. The whole point is Player A declared 2 pair when in fact the straight on board was the best hand and nobody caught this until player b mucked because of mis information. Now had Player A just turned over and not said a word and then player B looked at the board and mucked then I would say player a wins the pot. But when player A verbally declares 2 pair when in fact the board plays it should be a split pot. even though player B or anyone else at the table noticed the straight on board til he mucked. Here is a scenario for all those people that say he mucked so its mucked. Ok lets say your in a hand and another player bets out on the river and the pot is 300-400 dollars you call and the player announces he has a flush and you muck your 2 pair then he turns up his cards and you see he didn't have the flush and your 2 pair were good are you gonna say OH WELL I mucked I can't win the pot??? No your gonna say wait he said he had a flush but didn't, and the other player just simply mis read his hand. That's why the rule is in place to retrieve a mucked hand because of mis information. Now where I think this whole situation (thread topic) is different is the fact the best hand was on the board. It's not a case where the other players cards were the winning hand. Also you can say that it's the players fault for not properly reading his hand or the board but again NOBODY at the table caught it until cards were mucked.This is a special circumstance that I believe should have been resolved by spliting the pot. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us