US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Multi-tabling as a losing player
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="zinzir, post: 5596433, member: 406896"] [COLOR=#000000][SIZE=4]We all see it happening at micro stakes. Different tables occupied mostly by the same players. And if you look at the money in front of them, you routinely notice that some are overall losing, being ahead at one table, but behind at two.[/SIZE][/COLOR] [COLOR=#000000][SIZE=4]Also, according to SharkScope the same are also losing tournament players.[/SIZE][/COLOR] [COLOR=#000000][SIZE=4]So my question is: why would a losing player play multiple tables? It makes no sense to me, and here is why:[/SIZE][/COLOR] [COLOR=#000000][SIZE=4]It is a fallacy to think that one can shoot two birds at once by having the opportunity of playing stronger starting hands per hour on average, while maintaining a high level of entertainment through instant gratification. [/SIZE][/COLOR] [COLOR=#000000][SIZE=4]In reality, starting hand selection is a function of player's discipline and style, and is independent of the number of tables played at the same time.[/SIZE][/COLOR] [COLOR=#000000][SIZE=4]If one craves instant gratification and marginal hands look good to him while playing one table, expect multi-tabling to exacerbate these problems, not solve them. [/SIZE][/COLOR] [COLOR=#000000][SIZE=4]On the other hand, if one's goal is to become more disciplined and patient, it only makes sense to practice that approach at only one table at a time. [/SIZE][/COLOR] [COLOR=#000000][SIZE=4]With every additional table, the amount of attention payed at each table proportionally decreases, and as a direct result, the amount of mistakes proportionally increases. Misclicks, missed clues, monster starting hands not noticed because one is involved in a hand at another table and so on. [/SIZE][/COLOR] [COLOR=#000000][SIZE=4]Because one's attention is scattered, he learns less from playing 10 tables at a time than playing only 1 table, despite of 10X more hands happening on the screen. Joey Ingram has a Youtube video of him playing 50K hands in one day to beat a record, how much do you think he actually learned from those hands?[/SIZE][/COLOR] [COLOR=#000000][SIZE=4]Some players purchase a HUD to compensate for their inability to keep up with the increased number of tables they are playing at a time. While for winning players that may be understandable, for a losing player it makes no sense because the cost of HUD only adds to his financial losses.[/SIZE][/COLOR] [COLOR=#000000][SIZE=4]A HUD will never transform a losing player into a winning one, only experience can do that.[/SIZE][/COLOR] [COLOR=#000000][SIZE=4]Even winning players, semi pros and pros win less money per table while multi-tabling. They increase their hourly rate though, but not in a proportional way, meaning playing 2 tables at a time is more profitable than playing only one table, but not twice as profitable, and so on, winning a little more per hour with each additional table up to a certain point.[/SIZE][/COLOR] [COLOR=#000000][SIZE=4]But as a losing player, one is expected to lose more money with each additional table in at least a proportional ratio, meaning that by playing 2 tables at once one is expected to lose at least twice as much, likely even more. [/SIZE][/COLOR] [COLOR=#000000][SIZE=4]So, if you are one of us, the vast majority of CC members who are losing players, be smart and ideally only play money tables and freerolls, and if from time to time you want to test yourself at the real money tables and buy-in tournaments only play one table at a time. [/SIZE][/COLOR] [COLOR=#000000][SIZE=4]Don't be the ideal online poker room customer aka bottom of the food chain and the foundation upon which rake is generated. [/SIZE][/COLOR] [COLOR=#000000][SIZE=4]What do you think about all the above? What is your opinion about multi-tabling in general, and about multi-tabling as a losing player in particular?[/SIZE][/COLOR] [COLOR=#000000][SIZE=4]PS: I apologize for the lack of spacing between certain paragraphs to increase readability, somehow I wasn't able to insert them on this post, not exactly sure why.[/SIZE][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Multi-tabling as a losing player
Top