Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="dmorris68, post: 2009937, member: 40397"]
Both.  But mostly STTs.

For a number of reasons.  First, you have to be a winning player at 100NL or your just spewing money.  Second being BRM.  If you're rolled (and skilled enough) to play 100NL then you should be playing 100NL no matter how many tables you play.  Bankroll doesn't change with number of tables played.

Profit from multi-tabling comes from volume, which is also why RB and bonuses become so much more lucrative.  If you're a winning player, your bb/100 will drop somewhat but your hourly rate will increase in proportion to the number of tables you're playing.  Here's a simplistic example:  let's say you can play 100 hands per hour per table.  If you earn 10bb/100 playing one table, that's 10bb/hour.  Even if your bb/100 winrate drops by half to 5bb/100 when playing 4 tables, now you're making 20bb/hour.  Even if you dropped to 2.5bb/100 and earned the same 10bb/hour, you'd be earning rakeback/bonuses at 4x the rate, so you're still ahead.

The key is you have to be winning as you add tables.  Once you hit a point where you can't sustain a positive winrate (especially without RB) then your losses will grow dramatically faster than when single tabling.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us