Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Jesus Lederer, post: 421508, member: 3283"] You´re right Chris, i said that and i admit i was wrong. When i said that, i was thinking in the ethic of poker as a sport, so it would be unethical to "surrender" and don´t attempt to win even if that meant to take some risks, but then i realized that this game is about winning money, and that means that if it´s necessary you must leave your ego and the glory to achieve your real goals. An example of that is that i found unethical using softawares like PT to know your opponent´s style, because in my opinion the essence of the game is to get your own reads and exploit your opponent´s leaks according to them. Anyway i know that PT is extremely useful, it will help you to achieve your goals more easily and it´s legal, so it would be really silly to don´t use it if you can. Anyway i still defend that there´s no ethical problem with that bots´s software, unless you count the factor of tilting, because even if you get some bad beats the software won´t be affected. Aside from that, it´s the same as if you would be playing (and of course you have the big disvantage of not getting reads), so what´s the problem? It´s just saving your time instead of doing the same moves personally in front of the computer, so i don´t see why that would be cheating. Remember that i know that it´s illegal so nobody should use it, i´m just discussing the ethic part of the problem. I hope you understood my points. If you don´t agree, please tell me why you think i´m wrong, and you know that you don´t have to apologize. I´ll accept any critics if you tell me solid arguments, and as i showed before i´m able to recognize when i´m wrong (especially since i don´t have too much experience in life). [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us