Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Rumme1, post: 2966831, member: 182441"] the strength of the luck factor : AT ANY GIVEN TIME , AND FOR ANY LENGTH OF TIME , POKER CAN BE BASED ON A MAJORITY OF GOOD LUCK OR BAD LUCK, DESPITE HOW WELL A PLAYER PLAYED THE HANDS A PLAYER CAN PLAY EVERY HAND EXACTLY CORRECT PREFLOP ..100% OF THE TIME...AND STILL END UP LOSING MONEY IF THEY ARE CONSISTENTLY UNLUCKY. THIS CAN ALSO BE TRUE ON THE FLOP/ TURN . A AVERAGE PLAYER WITH CONSISTENT ABOVE AVERAGE LUCK CAN consistently beat a ABOVE AVERAGE PLAYER WITH CONSISTENT BELOW AVERAGE LUCK . ..EVEN OVER MONTHS/YEARS OF PLAY. These are things you wont usually learn in poker books. You learn it from decades of playing in multiple games with multiple players who have multiple styles. Quite often, a lucky player will win the biggest pots, by doing the wrong thing at the right time and relying completely on good luck to make them winner. When certain people misquote my claims, to try and make me look bad, then I reply as I feel neccessary. One person on this thread insinuated that I made a bunch of claims...which I did not..therefore I responded to this liar, they way I thought was best. Probability is just one factor in poker...you have things like randomness , along with the fact that certain players have much more consistent good luck patterns, then other players. It will never equal out for every player in the game...Ive seen some players that are champions at hitting miracle river cards on a consistent basis. I cant explain why they are this lucky and I know if I played like them I would lose a ton of money chasing such cards. I find it fascinating how the element of luck, is so powerful in poker and I find it annoying how so many will claim the power of luck, is basically meaningless in poker , and that skill will always dictate the outcome. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us