US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Not betting the nuts on the river
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="OzExorcist, post: 2401155, member: 23910"] Sorry, but IMO this isn't even [b]close[/b] to a good enough reason to suspend or change the rules about betting the nuts or mucking. If someone chooses to fold to your river bet, then they should have the right to muck their cards unseen [I]regardless[/I] of what you're holding. You bet, they folded. You haven't paid to see their cards, so you don't [i]get[/i] to see their cards. Suggesting that you should be entitled to the benefit of extra information in addition to the benefit of having an unbeatable hand is... well... greedy is probably the most charitable way I could describe that. It's having your cake and eating it too. Changing the rules to allow you to check so that you can see their cards would be even more problematic, because then every softplayer and angle shooter in the world would just say they were checking "to see what the other player had". The idea that you'd even want to do that is a bit wonky to me too. I mean the only time you'd even want to consider doing it is because you know your opponent has a hand so bad that there's exactly zero chance that they'll call. First of all, it's not possible to know that with 100% certainty. Second, if you did somehow know that, then how much do you really gain by knowing [i]exactly[/i] what garbage they had? And third, since you can't know that with 100% certainty, surely you're better off putting a bet out there for the times when you're wrong and they do have a hand that can call. Even if it's only 1% of the time it's still +EV. And while it's true that some card rooms [i]might[/i] enforce this rule differently between cash games and tournaments, I can't think of any good reasons why they should. Again, if your card room doesn't enforce this rule, whatever format you're playing, it's a good idea to ask why. And consider playing somewhere else, because they're basically endorsing collusion and softplaying. The only time I can think they should even make an exception to the rule is when the nuts is the five cards on the board (so it's obvious to everyone that it's going to be a split pot) and the rake cap hasn't been reached yet (so players would effectively be losing money by betting / raising) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Not betting the nuts on the river
Top