Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="nevadanick, post: 1026351, member: 27547"] Not drunk at all (I don't drink OR smoke). DB said: "I don't [B]wanna be[/B] that person. I feel bad for fooling people to fold." I used (and clearely stated it was in regards to me) that playing limit can be most 'unlike' no limit games. Why play something that makes you something you "don't [B]wanna be[/B]"? DB asked is essence 'what she should do'? Am I not entitled to an opinion? ANY game other than nlhe is for someone who does not like what it takes to play. What about "Be what and who you are, not what someone else thinks you should be"? My example using stud was justification for MY opinion about NOT having to change. Not having to be someone I am not, just as she should pursue whatever game wiggles her crank. You 'reach for the stars'. They don't interest me. I'll dig for gold, may never find any, but it won't keep me from digging. DB goes on to say: "I love HORSE". All 5 are limit games, which led me to my comparison of limit vs. no limit games. Maybe you weren't reading everything she wrote. All poker games are great games, if YOU enjoy playing them and can do well. Keep doing what works for you. Any variation from nlhe MTT's would be welcomed by me also. The only problem with PLO or any of the PL games is that especially in FR's, they are even more like nlhe, only going to all-ins even quicker. As a general rule, nlhe FR's (a few forum FR's excluded) bust close to 2/3 of the field in the first hour. In PL games it is not uncommon for 3/4 of the field to be gone the first hour. At least speaking for our own live Omaha MTT's here in town, the play is soooo much better, it makes it a pleasurable, and profitable game. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us