US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Obvious observations and the Scientific Method
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="thasauce7, post: 677461, member: 17790"] I haven't posted in a while after the Absolute thread started going downhill because of all the accusations that are thrown around without basis, and I thought there are a few things that need to be remembered that could help prevent further drama from occuring. Poker is a math based game that has odds and probabilities, which means it is very simple to apply the principles of the scientific method to compare with the accepted values of odds and probabilities for every variation of poker. A while back someone had a large volume of hands recorded and the accepted percentages that those hands were supposed to win, versus the recorded winning percentages of the collected data. The results were very very similar. That thread should be stickied. If not then we should make another one. You can't argue with the figures. Another easily forgotten fact is not everyone wins at poker. And there is more to it than paying your dues and gaining experience. You have to learn from your experiences and analyze hand after hand and sometimes even whole tournaments to advance not only your knowledge of the game, but your skill. And thats something people don't stop to think about. Finally, the last point I will try to make is about the whole Absolute thing. Yes there was foul play involved, and it was glaringly obvious in the statistics that there was something wrong with the numbers which led to this whole shebang. People compiled hands and exchanged figures and the numbers were all out of whack, and look where it got them. Alot further than pointing fingers and rigged posts ever got anyone else lol. I think we should sticky that old thread and the official absolute thread as a reminder of what happened and as a reminder of how statistics in poker can be a powerful tool. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Obvious observations and the Scientific Method
Top