US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Omaha Hi-Lo vs. Hi: difference in variance?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="DS3, post: 5384831, member: 407846"] [B]ventrolloquist[/B]- I am a broken record on this but PLO/Omaha in general have changed in recent times. True, Omaha has always drawn an element attracted to gamble/high variance. However, within a serious format (a European championship for instance), Omaha is a fascinating game played almost exclusively post flop. Sophisticated players seldom make flamboyant pre flop raises, they see the flop then yet proceed with caution as the hand unwinds through the turn and then river. To be cliched, it is like playing chess. Beautiful to watch. The media in recent times has televised high rollers playing a wild, gambling version of Omaha/PLO so as to attract viewers. Before that it was regarded too cerebral, complex and boring to televise. Having dumbed the game down, a newer audience has been habituated to thinking this is how to play Omaha. It's wild and swingy, it's cray-cray and fun! Because of this, I avoid playing it as frequently as I once did. My advice, however, would be to [U]always[/U] dip back into Omaha/PLO and give it another try- hopefully you can find a session where people are playing in a measured way and you will start to get a glimpse of what an absorbing/fulfilling game it can be! In the interim, keep trying the Hi/Lo version as at least you will not get battered to bits quite so hard! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Omaha Hi-Lo vs. Hi: difference in variance?
Top