US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Omaha vs. Hold 'Em: Which is more a game of skill?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Divebitch, post: 1143437, member: 39020"] There is no question whatsoever that Omaha is more complex than Hold'em, H/L even moreso. However, as Gary points out above, there is not necessarily more [B]skill[/B] involved, for the reasons he cites. That last part, had to be from a Hold'em book, probably written by some punk who tried Omaha once and didn't get the hang of it, because he was applying certain Hold'em strategies that don't work so well in Omaha. It is utter ignorance to think Omaha is more of a 'gambling game'. Yes, Omaha is more of a drawing game. But you still have to understand the odds of hitting draws with the cards you have to work with. And as Gary also mentions, the odds of your draws hitting are [B]predictable[/B]. Sure, you can sometimes get screwed by the river. But once one learns the difference between a naked A2 and A23 starting hand (A2 = 30 of 48 (over 60%) outs either will hit and screw you), they will understand what [B]is a good starting hand that will take you to the river[/B]. The complexity of Omaha, especially H/L includes awareness of a multitude of possibilities and factors too numerous to mention - including, but not limited to counterfeit protection (i.e. A23) and freerolling (meaning your hand can probably only get better, i.e. having nut straight but also flush draw - or flush with top set in case the board pairs up), and the concept of 'wraps' (straights). So bottom line, in terms of 'skill', it's comparing apples & oranges. While there is bluffing in Omaha (usually semi-) and positional considerations etc, there seems to be more 'nuances' in Hold'em with regard to bluffing, aggression, and reads on your opponents - certainly skills, and IMHO, harder to learn. So your question is tough to answer. If we define skill ([B]as you say[/B]) as the game where the best players are more likely to win, I'd still have to pick Omaha, simply because the playing field is much worse, especially at the lowest levels. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Omaha vs. Hold 'Em: Which is more a game of skill?
Top