US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Online Poker Article For U.S. players
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="quads, post: 647367, member: 18369"] [CENTER][B]POKER FACES WEAK HAND[/B][/CENTER] [CENTER][B]Prospects dim in online bid[/B][/CENTER] [SIZE=3]Article printed in New York Post yesterday 10/29/07[/SIZE] [SIZE=3]Poker players who descended on Capitol Hill last week face long odds in trying to convince Congress to legalize playing the card game on the internet.[/SIZE] [SIZE=3]But one wild card could force Washington’s hand: an international trade dispute with Antigua over online gambling that could end up leaving the U.S. on the hook for billions of dollars.[/SIZE] [SIZE=3]The World Trade Organization recently ruled that the U.S. violated its international treaty commitments by going after offshore online gambling outfits without cracking down on American operators offering remote betting on horse and dog racing.[/SIZE] [SIZE=3]After the ruling, Washington said it would remove Internet gambling from its WYO treaty obligations. That raised the ire of such allies as Europe and Japan, which filed separate compensation claims against the U.S.[/SIZE] [SIZE=3]“In a matter of months, you’re going to see billions of dollars in trade sanctions coming down against the United States,” former New York Sen. Alfonse D’Amato, chairman of the lobbying group Poker Players Alliance, told The Post.[/SIZE] [SIZE=3]“Then, I believe we will start to have a profoundly new and different group lobbying, saying you’ve got to stop this prohibition [on Internet gambling],” he said. “we look like the ugly American.”[/SIZE] [SIZE=3]Playing poker online for money isn’t explicitly illegal in the U.S. And Congress stopped short of passing an outright ban on Internet gambling sites last October.[/SIZE] [SIZE=3]Instead, lawmakers cracked down by banning credit card companies from making payments to online gambling sites through legislation snuck on to a late-night bill on port security.[/SIZE] [SIZE=3]The Poker Players Alliance, which fronts Chris Moneymaker, Annie Duke and many other poker champions, met with about 50 members of Congress to try to build support for two pro-online gambling bills.[/SIZE] [SIZE=3]One bill from Rep. Barney Frank {D-Mass.} would broadly legalize and regulate Internet gambling. Another more narrow proposal from Rep. Robert Wexler (D-Fla.) would allow Internet poker bets by grouping poker with other skill games, such as backgammon and chess.[/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Online Poker Article For U.S. players
Top