Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Gunner57, post: 1774137, member: 78827"]
I agree.  I started reading Theory of Poker less than a year ago and it just was too dry of a read for me and it required too much concentration to follow it.  So after the first few chapters I set it down and continued playing and re-reading some other books.

I have put in at least another 200K hands and have decided to stop playing for a break.  While on my break I picked up Theory of poker again and it was not quite as difficult to follow.  I think some of his discussions and examples follow a line that unless you have played some hands it is difficult to follow.

So far the read is good this time (only about half way through).  A lot of the concepts in this book are great and were forward thinking when this book came out.  For today I think it can give you an idea of what modern poker is built on but I am not expecting anything revolutionary from it.  Just help get a clearer picture of concepts and why you should do thing things you should do.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us