eberetta1
Legend
Loyaler
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2007
- Total posts
- 2,609
- Awards
- 7
- Poker Chips
- 255
- Casino Coins
- 5
- #26
Agree. I have always believed rake is our silent enemy. So unless you have a sponsor or some form of rakeback, you are just a pawn in a game of chess. And yes, a pawn can win a game of chess, but it is not very frequent.pentazepam said:It's much harder. Especially online.
And almost no traffic at the other game variants than NLH and a little PLO. And on most sites, there is not much action over 100NLH.
The problem with people who think the solution is to just study harder is that, because of the rake, it's not enough to be a little better than your opponents - you must be a lot better. And it's hard to find players who consistently make big mistakes, except at the lowest levels. So you reach a point of diminishing returns, no matter how much you study. Poker is not like chess.
PLO is a little less solved than NLH and has a lot of gamblers, but the variance is ****ing brutal.
View attachment 390479







