Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Bob23bk, post: 2638573, member: 133743"]
"criminal sexual assault on a child" (from OP)

I'm no lawyer, but in [U]most[/U] jurisdictions this would not be considered sexual assault (so long as consent was given) because there is usually a clause that makes an exception if the age difference is 2 (or 3, depending) years or less. Also, (s)he was 26 at time of offense.

I see what you're getting at, but I find it hard to believe this would be construed as 'criminal sexual assault on a child' rather than 'indecent exposure', even if he had unwittingly exposed himself to children.

Back to OP, I think (s)he may deserve a second chance here provided that the sentence has been served and all. How many children are at poker events afterall? (Let's keep it real please;)) Attacking the representative on issues not related to their job is ad hominem, and should be frowned upon imo. I'd also like to think that the company was aware beforehand due to common background checks for jobs, and if not, how stupid can they be to not even google this person :rofl: I believe that the rage tweets would be grounds for termination (or at least some other sort of recourse) as that's obviously not how someone should be representing any poker company. Bad beats are a part of the game, the best player doesn't always win, and if they can't accept that they are in the wrong place!

That being said, let's not turn this post into a strawman argument (IE: Bob is ok with child rape but not twitter rage:rolleyes:)
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us