Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="BigCountryAA, post: 1952607, member: 90935"] LOL 60 hands as a base for this study is ridiculous. These people that don't understand how the game is played other then the bare basics shouldn't be making such concrete conclusions or doing studies that are biased like this one is. He obviously wanted the study to show it was luck or he would have brought in known poker winners and not self proclaimed experts. He would have also had them play way more then 60 hands. The skill in poker isn't all about what card you are getting. This is the point he is missing. It involves a lot of things. Knowing when to fold, reading your opponent for tells and betting patterns, Knowing the odds and using them to your advantage and plenty more. Of course there is some luck involved in the short term but if you give me the nuts vs a garbage hand 10 hands in a row he may win a couple of times but He'll still be a broke ass bitch after it's over. [/QUOTE]