Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Arjonius, post: 1952917, member: 5332"] It's a matter of interpretation. If for example, we posit a two-player game where player A has a 2% advantage over player B, then the result of any single iteration is highly luck-dependent. That never changes no matter the sample size. However, the cumulative result over many iterations is that A is a big winner, similar to how casinos make a lot of money from the small edge they have at roulette. Poker is somewhat different since the edge is skill-based, not designed into how the betting works. As a result, it's not consistent. But the underlying principle is unchanged. The player who has an advantage over the long run will win. [/QUOTE]