US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Question about a difference between online and reality
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="OzExorcist, post: 975446, member: 23910"] It's absolutely a relevant distinction if you want your argument to make even a tiny lick of sense :p Here's the thing: Wherever you're getting your live winner figures from, be it 10%, 15%, 20% of players, whatever the figure is - I promise you those "noted poker authorities" weren't talking solely about SnGs. They're just far too small a part of the live poker market for that to be plausible. You've gotta compare apples with apples. Winning players could include players who lucked out and won a big tournament - I'd be 99.9% certain Jerry Yang is a winning player over his 'career', for example. Reckon Jerry Yang would be a winning player if you sat him in a $5/$10 live game for a year though? I don't. There's equivalent online examples as well, naturally. People that freeroll their way into huge online tournaments and win big aren't unheard of, it happened at the latest Stars WCOOP main event. Point is though, your live figures include these kind of winners, and your online figures exclude them. Immediately we have a flaw in the data set. As for cash games and whether we should expect the win rates at them to be different to SnGs, I've never seen data. Nor are any of us ever likely to, because that's not the way cash games work. But a difference in the win rates wouldn't surprise me in the least. Why? You've said it yourself: you're a winning SnG player who's lucky to break even at $25NL online. Think you're the only one? I won't argue that SnGs require specific skills - we could argue all day over whether those skills make you "better" than a cash game or MTT player, but in the end it really doesn't matter. What I [B]will[/B] argue, however, is that SnGs can be much more forgiving than cash games or MTTs. You mentioned "working the structure" and you're correct to - it's a big part of SnG play. I think therein lies your explanation though. There's no such thing as limping over the bubble and into the money in a cash game, and while the same thing can happen in MTTs you've got to play a lot longer to get there. That, I put it to you, is the reason you can expect higher win rates in SnGs than you can in cash games. You might work the structure to put pressure on people at key moments, but others work the structure to grind out constant strings of third places. Take that safety net away from them in a cash game, however, and that player becomes a long term loser. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Question about a difference between online and reality
Top