Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="OzExorcist, post: 714620, member: 23910"]
I think you'll find that's more of a post-flop thing, and even then they're not so much rules as... guidelines.  Kinda like the pirate's code or something, me hearties!
 
There's a couple of reasons why I wouldn't put too much stock in these unspoken guidelines for this situation too:
 
First, I'm assuming this is a single-table SnG?  With seven players still in, we're still a long way from the bubble, so making [I]sure[/I] you eliminate this player isn't as pressing.
 
Second, they've got bugger-all money anyway.  Tripling them up still won't make them much of a threat, and the side pot has the potential to be a lot bigger than the main pot.
 
Anywho - on the surface it seems like an odd play, but I'd figure it for someone who was planning from the start to limp-raise.  The all-in player probably wasn't part of the plan, but it's not an amount that's going to worry any of the other stacks.
 
If I were in Seat 6, I wouldn't worry [I]too[/I] much about the all-in player, and just play your hand as normal against the raiser.  Incidentally, though, if I were the player in Seat 6 I probably would've either raised myself to isolate or just gotten out of the way.  Flat calling the all-in (especially such a small one) makes this messier than it needs to be.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us