US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Rigged: The AA test
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Stu_Ungar, post: 1041663, member: 39779"] Whats the point? The people who dont believe its rigged will have yet another statistic that proves it isnt rigged. The people who believe its rigged will continue their claim and ignore the AA vs K statistic, just as they ignore the statistics that we already have. The problem that we face with this type of thread is that it is logically impossible to prove a negative. In layman's terms.. we can never PROVE that poker isn't rigged because you cannot PROVE the non-existence of of a non-event (its mathematically impossible). However you can prove the existence of an event. So all we can do is pick a predicted statistic and, i.e. the AA vs KK statistic and then compare it to a large sample of date. The people who say it is rigged are do not seem to be bound by such logic. All they need do is design a test or predict a statistic and then obtain a large sample of data to test the prediction. To date, no such test has indicated that online poker is rigged. So once again we go round and round.. those who believe it is rigged will continue to do so, those who dont will not. Only one anomaly springs to mind. Why are the those who believe online poker is rigged willing to play it? I do not believe it is rigged and therefore play with peace of mind. I would not play any game I thought was rigged. This probably accounts for the lack of evidence (of poker being rigged) presented by those who believ it is rigged. It not simply complacenty on their part! If you think it through, they believe it is rigged and still play, therefore if it were proved to be rigged, their belief would simply be confirmed.. and therefore they would still play! So now you have to ask yourself, what is the point of entering into this debate? As its logically impossible to prove a negative, those believe poker is not rigged can never prove the fact that it isnt rigged. As many of those who believe it is rigged, indeed play online poker, evidence either way will not alter their actions. Therefore they will never be sufficiently motivated to go out and prove what they know to be true. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Rigged: The AA test
Top