Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Stu_Ungar, post: 1064775, member: 39779"]
Let me get this straight in my head.
 
Instead of providing your own opinion as proof, you, instead quote someone else's opinion and expect it to be treated as hard fact.
 
We need to get away from opinions and start providing proof. Proof would be in the form of a study showing that, for a large sample, the actual results were greatly different to the expected results.
 
Would people please stop citing hear-say as fact.. because I know a guy who says that poker isn't rigged.. is that enough to say that it isn't?? NO.
 
I can only provide the results of the AA test, which show that the frequency which AA occurs is consistent with the expected frequency (in the long run)
 
If you feel that the flop is 'rigged' then please provided details of a test that we could conduct. Not a vague idea.. but a well thought out scientific test.
 
I would be happy to provide results to assist with the data collection for such a test and would also be happy to draw the conclusion that poker is rigged if thats was the logical conclusion from the results.
 
However I am not willing to entertain the notion that it is rigged without suitable data supporting the argument.
 
So if you are certain that poker is rigged, please design the test and we will provide the data.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us