Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="GDRileyx, post: 1095511, member: 51264"] This is interesting. Evidently Four Dogs was cumulating results, and PStars was real close to the expected frequency, but FTilt was significantly off. You can see this quite plainly on the two sets of results on this page:[URL]https://www.cardschat.com/forum/general-poker-13/rigged-aa-test-100791/index14.html[/URL] Even though PStars has more than twice as many hands reported as FTilt, FTilt has about 200 times as much deviation from the predicted results. I play mostly on PStars, because my intuition tells me that PStars is not as rigged as FTitlt, which is not as rigged as UBet. This study seems to bear out my conclusion. [/QUOTE]