Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="zachvac, post: 688581, member: 26306"]
Ah, good point. I was thinking that since it was preflop and not dependent on going to showdown that it could be thought of as an SRS, because although I'd assume CC to have better quality players, I wouldn't expect them to get AA any more or any less. But the fact that a person's short-term luck may affect them participating in the study hadn't really crossed my mind.

Of course you know what that means. Since it must be skewed towards more, because the people who participate are the unlucky ones, pokerstars must actually give more AA than our average as well, just as in the full tilt. And you know what that means...

omg pokerstars is rigged to give action hands. Our total scientific analysis that used logic invalidating our scientific methods have proven it. Run run, get all your money off pokerstars.

lol and yes I'm joking, although this fact does show that perhaps this entire test is not free of bias and thus cannot be on its own trusted as proof or even evidence either way of poker being rigged or not.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us