Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Four Dogs, post: 715346, member: 2668"]
And maybe you don't understand the intent of this thread. You could just read the OP but that might be too much of a hassle so here's a refresher. 
 
Many people believe that Poker Sites juice the deck by manipulating the shuffle to produce more action hands which presumably increases the pot size and in turn the rake.
 
I postulated that were this true, we should see some descrepencies in the number of times big hands like AA were actually dealt compared to the number mathamatically expected.
 
I then asked members to contributen the number of ring hands they were dealt AA in relation to their total number of hands so we could use this as a benchmark to check the accuracy of the RNG at various on-line poker rooms.
 
For what it's worth, I'm not naive enough to blindly trust any profit driven organization. But as far as this thread is concerned I don't care about Arthur Anderson, King Arthur or Chester Allen Arthur and I don't need to be talked down to like a three year old. If you want to contribute some data to this project, or just say something relevent to its intent, then welcome aboard. Otherwise take your insulting and paranoid apersions as to my integrity elsewhere.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us