Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Poker Orifice, post: 738008, member: 33113"] [b]Rigged or Retarded..[/b] I love it when there's a guy on my table goin' off about it being 'rigged',.. pleazzz... if so, then why is he still playing on it?? I've done a bit of research on it and have written a blog on another site about it, with examples, etc. I know that all the sites I researched had rng tests done periodically and had authorized certification to show for it. Why would any site risk their credibility with something so ludicrous and can you imagine the extra costs and work involved with it,.. craziness. "Okay Charlie,.. we're going to be needing to go ahead with that new highrise to house all of the computer programmers we now need for rigging the hands on the tables. Why don't we have pocket deuces get dealt with pocket A's this week,.. and hmm,... yah let's do it on the freeroll tables so the deuces dude will deposit some cash to the site when he hits quads on the flop, and just to phuck with them some more, let's have an A come down on the river. That'll mess with their minds a bit, hee hee" "okay boss,... right after I get through with those other 932,000 different hand possiblities on my desk right now." It's just total insanity! On an opposite note, I watched a good portion of the FTOPS on Fulltilt, the one hosted by Erick Lindgren and saw him go in with 7-7 '4x' within one hour and each time he was dominated by a higher pair. Each of those times he hit the 7 to make a set??? When I started watching he was mid-way in a field of around 150, but after an hour or so he was in first?? Repeatedly he hit 2-outers, at least a half dozen times or more and only once did he actually get beat by a better hand going in preflop. Was pretty 'odd' for sure and did create a ton of static at the time (the 'chat' was going insane, lol). Was a bit disheartening to witness it and once he was on the final table he had at least a 3x bigger stack than all of his opponents. Would've been interesting to have tracked the hands throughout that hour, and to calculate the odds,... seeing just what the odds were of him repeatedly hitting those sets, time and time again, each time with the weaker hand,.. funny(?) it was almost always with 7-7 ?? (4x that I witnessed anyways). [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us