Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="grift, post: 746855, member: 34903"] There's probably a way to get around the large sample size we just need to think about it a bit. One tool that comes to mind is re-sampling: [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resampling_%28statistics"]Resampling (statistics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/URL]) Anyways, even if we can't get something nice and neat, it'd still be fun to at least see just how small of a sample size we can really get away with. Or, we could find a way to test for randomness. I mean, if these sites are rigging and are supposedly "action generating" there would definitely be some sort of unexpected trend in the size of the pot. Yeah I'm just throwing ideas out there, I think it would be kinda cool if we could come up with a way to measure this stuff. Well after looking through my handy stat book the smaller sample size/low probability of a "success" does make it pretty hard to do. [/QUOTE]