Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="GotaLovePoke, post: 969743, member: 46031"]
Just thought I would add my own knowledge.

Although I am quite impressed with the seriousness of your statistical perseverance, I could not help but notice some flaws.

It is quite important to consider the size of the pool compared to the size of the hands dealt, we obviously have a small statistical pool compared to the dealt hands.

Also, it is important to not put the free games and the buy in's or paid games in the same basket, in fact, it would be wrong to do so....

Thirdly, an average is nothing without a confidence measure, wich we don't have here, wich we should have obviously.

To have a PERFECT statistical sample, we need to start on the right hypothesis, We need to either, put everything in the same basket, BUT make sure we keep proportional divisions between the type of games, privates etc... Or, divide it by category, but to have a confident measure we would need a large pool per category, wich would not necesserely be easy to get.

People that design poker site, could in fact increase, slightly, % of high dealt hands, BUT, know this, it would probably not affect you, personaly, unless your one to win the loto often ;)
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us