Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="thasauce7, post: 647359, member: 17790"]
I see what you are saying, but I'm pretty sure in this case it doesn't work like that.  If your talking about who killed Kennedy or something like that, the type of argument you provided would be sufficient to not be considered correct or incorrect, but rather a statement of facts are facts and observations or opinions have no bearing on what really happened.
 
But this is poker.  There is no changing what cards were dealt, there is no arguing the math on compiled hands that match up correctly with the given odds.  Take that absolute thread for example, a group of players noticed that the information they compiled did not add up with the accepted values for any player ever and investigated.  Now look where that brought them.
 
In regards to being rigged or not rigged the game of poker can be approached by mathematical methods that you would use in places like a physics lab.  What I mean by that is using percent errors, standard deviation, samples, and other calculations to decide if everything adds up.  If you don't believe that, I'm not going to argue with you, I'm just going to feel sorry for you.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us