US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Rules question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="OzExorcist, post: 3324659, member: 23910"] You're confusing two rules here - acting out of turn, and going all in for less than a minimum raise. If they go all in out of turn then it depends on the action. If one of the in between players makes a bet, then the player who went all in out of turn takes their bet back and has the option to fold, call or raise. That has nothing to do with the rule on going all in for less than a minimum raise - which is yes, you [i]can[/i] raise less than the minimum if you're raising all in. The house shouldn't change the rules to the detriment of all [i]other[/i] players just because there are idiots though. They should enforce the rules fairly and correctly, and penalise or evict the idiots as appropriate. At the end of the day I guess it's their card room and they can do whatever they like. But I think this is amazingly short-sighted. They're making a bad decision on rules just to keep one player in the game paying rake. That bad decision has the potential to lead to very unfair outcomes for other players making innocent mistakes in the future. And unfairly penalising people for making innocent mistakes is a pretty good way of making them not want to play in your card room any more. So no, I don't think it's OK for the other players. I also don't see how ruling the way your card room has makes a difference to anything. If this idiot is deliberately acting out of turn, he's giving free information to the players still to act in the process. They can act on their hands [i]knowing[/i] he wants to make a big raise when it's his turn to act. Whether you (correctly) take his bet back and give him the option to fold, call or raise, or whether you make his bet stand, the other players know he wants to make it 1500. And if he's doing that without even looking at his cards then yes it's high variance but it's good for the players who know what they're doing - DUCY? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Rules question
Top