Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="cAPSLOCK, post: 882301, member: 42960"]
Well "every single hand I've played on that site" is something on the order of only 10k.

My stats show that playing 90% 6max tables I am running 27/13/3.2.

If that makes me loose/passive/passive then I have slightly different definitions.  Loose yes, passive well not really.

I honestly don't think it has enough data from my tiny pool of 10k hands to know me accurately yet.  After all it gets it's data from users, and I bet I haven't sat with them every time down at my little stakes.  I don't play tourney except for odd fun here and there so it has to have me from ring games.  In fact I am MUCH tighter in a tourney than a ring game.  But like I said I haven't been playing them much at all.

And like I said i figured I'd run into opposition on my opinion.  I don't think results (100k, pole dancers etc) justify massive player database collusion.  FWIW, Pokerstars at least agrees with me.

But yeah... I'll keep trying for my "miracle flops and 2 outers".  I'm just that dumb.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us