Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="OzExorcist, post: 1820944, member: 23910"]
Still obviously a small sample size, and you're doing good, but as has been alluded to above it'd be a lot better if your first and second numbers were around the other way.
 
That sounds like an obvious thing to say, because you'd have made more money if they were around the other way and that's [I]obviously[/I] a good thing.  But having twice as many seconds as you do firsts is probably an indication that you've either got leaks in your heads-up game, or you're getting to heads up short-stacked more often than not, which is probably an indication of leaks at earlier stages.
 
On the whole I wouldn't be too worried about your ITM number.  It doesn't necessarily help us all that much because (and I know this is an extreme example) you can have an ITM percentage of 55 but if they're all third places you'll still make a loss.  I can't remember the numbers, but I'm pretty sure most winning SnG players have an ITM percentage below 50 (maybe even something like 35 - like I said, been a while and I don't really remember) and that works for them because they have a comparatively high percentage of first place finishes making up for the times they don't cash at all.  FWIW I've got no idea what my own ITM percentage is.  ROI and $/hr are much more useful figures if you're looking for an overall indication of how you're doing.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us