riverboatrat
Visionary
Silver Level
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2007
- Total posts
- 523
- Poker Chips
- 0
- Casino Coins
- 0
- #1
PokerPete
RIP Logic, Sanity, and Democracy
Loyaler
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2007
- Total posts
- 21,531
- Awards
- 1
- Poker Chips
- 1,561
- Casino Coins
- 0
- #2
that would be fine with me as long as the river wasn't a KKardKlub said:
kolobot
Enthusiast
Silver Level
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2008
- Total posts
- 57
- Poker Chips
- 0
- Casino Coins
- 0
- #3
KardKlub said:
Ok and I would be the one against you heads up holding the fifth ace
... full tilt poker for ever
riverboatrat
Visionary
Silver Level
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2007
- Total posts
- 523
- Poker Chips
- 0
- Casino Coins
- 0
- #4
what the hell are you guys talking about ?
If theres a king on the turn OR river its an instant split pot even if the turn and river were both KK giving someone else quad kings it would STILL be a split pot because the best 5 cards possible are the 4 aces and a king kicker which is on the board
If theres a king on the turn OR river its an instant split pot even if the turn and river were both KK giving someone else quad kings it would STILL be a split pot because the best 5 cards possible are the 4 aces and a king kicker which is on the board
DaFrench1
Visionary
Silver Level
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2007
- Total posts
- 578
- Poker Chips
- 0
- Casino Coins
- 0
- #5
riverboatrat said:
No, really?