US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
strange ruling in last nights wsop me
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Four Dogs, post: 964118, member: 2668"] Pushing your chips forward and then pulling them back is not a string bet . A string bet is making a verbal declaration of your impending action and then modifying it. An example would be "I call.... and reraise you all in" or "I raise 100... and 500 more". While the 2 are obstensibly the same, the problem with an actual string bet is that the end of the declared action is ambiguous and any pause between two declarations can be used to gather information on your opponents impending reaction. I agree that the intent of pushing your chips forward and then withdrawing them serves exactly the same purpose, however, the conclusion of the action is far less ambiguous, namely, the removal of your hands from the stack. This no different from chess and makes the decisions of the dealer and the acknowlegement of all other players at the table alot simpler. Poker tournaments would become prohibitally unmanagable if the ruling were based on the chips moving past some imagined line and left up to the descretion of the dealer. All consistency between different tables would evaporate and precious time would be waisted debating the validity of that ruling. Even with this ACTION LINE, we could imagine the inevitable debate over how far over the line did the chips go, or what portion of the chips crossed the line, or what happens when the top of a stack accidentally spills over the line. Many of the rules applied at major poker tournaments are designed not so much to be fair, as they are to drive the progress of the tournament itself without need of costly intervention by tournament officials. It would seem to me that the only unambiguous, indeputable and clearly defined conclusion to this sort of bet is the removal of the bettors hands from the chip stack. It's all good and well that we make rail calls from the comfort of our lazy-boy 3 months after the conclusion of a tournament, but how would you feel if you were actually sitting at the table with a short stack and the blind clock ticking down while officials play detective deliberating over the intent of an event that they did not themselves witness? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
strange ruling in last nights wsop me
Top