Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Syfted, post: 1232661, member: 41763"] I'm really asking if your ROI will be greater in tournaments that don't pay multiple places. Because cEV=$EV, will poor players no longer have the inherent edge of the bubble factor and thus have a lower ROI? In a tournament that pays only one spot, is the difference between +ROI and -ROI players greater over the long run than in a tournament which has a very flat payout structure? What does that difference look like in terms of $/hr? For example, in the Stars double or nothings, half the field gets paid, but you probably still have an edge over the people who got beat. You'd rather run them through in a single tournament. Your variance would be higher, but so would your hourly. The problem I'm running into is that idk if the mass volume of tournament data is really out there to make these assertions... [/QUOTE]