Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Boltneck, post: 670195, member: 29202"] Fair comment Zach, I stand corrected. I do still believe however that my main point is valid, which was that the test is not flawed just because pwnagefactor54 got a high score with lucky guesses. In any given random situation, a lucky break is possible. If he (or anyone else) selected random answers again, they would almost certainly get a different score. The fact that pwnagefactor54 got a high score was down to luck rather than any failing with the test. Of course, whether the test is a true reflection of one's poker playing ability is a different arguement. [/QUOTE]