OzExorcist
Broomcorn's uncle
Bronze Level
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2007
- Total posts
- 8,585
- Awards
- 1
- Poker Chips
- 1
- Casino Coins
- 0
- #51
switch0723 said:live poker should never be played as an only source of income imo, unless you have enough money already to live off, so that you don't need to win everyday. As far as i see it, live poker is more of a social activity than a genuine money maker. Unless you are going to travel the world to play in major events, i.e. wsop, ept, wpt, wsop europe etc etc. or smaller ones such as irish open etc. I think that is the only real way to maintain living off poker winnings but once again you need a huge bankroll to start.
I would've said the opposite was true - you can make a decent living playing live cash games if you're good enough, but you'd want to be financially set up already if you wanted to play the tournament circuit because it can be so long between cashes. It's an expensive lifestyle too, flying around the world and living out of hotels.
Live play also has some other advantages that online doesn't: when you finish a session in a casino, for example, the money's right there in your hand. No having to wait six weeks for a cheque to come in the mail or having to stress about whether the government is going to outlaw your preferred transaction method.
The only real issue with being a live cash game pro, in my eyes, is the availability of action (I'm making the assumption that we're good enough to beat whatever games we're choosing to play). There's a reason most of the world's live pros live in Vegas - outside of there, I'd want to do some serious scouting to make sure there was enough action to support me before I tried something like this. I know I'd be hard pressed to find it in my town.



