Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Chemist, post: 2121606, member: 55995"]
Thanks for clarifications Oz,
I was aware of the single chip ruling, having learnt the hard way by lobbing in a big chip without ' friggin announcing intentions'. :o

In all these cases though it was multiple extra chips.

[I]11. ~~~increased to the proper size (but no  greater). This does not apply to a player who has unintentionally put  too much in to call.
[/I]Kinda hard to interpret the unintentional part, Looks like saying 'oh I only meant to call' doesn't cut it though.

So the general rule would be that it will be increased. (So in the first case Roberto Romanello shouldn't have had his chips returned for the call, and in fact his intention of raising should have been forced to be a very weak looking min raise.

The second and third scenarios the same amateur who simply couldn't count chips under the pressure could perhaps have been classed as unintentional but got hammered with the first part of the regs.

Always appreciate the  Ozy rules, not just for football, 
confirming what JusSumguy and tenbob had said about this situation.
Thanks to all contributors for helping me with my puzzlement.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us