Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="fighter, post: 1427636, member: 61922"]
Criticisms

Your Kx example is reasonably bad. I agree with the point you are making about domination but it is the exact same as if you flopped a pair of 8's with 86 on K85 board. Beting the flop is not as good as checking and Bluff catching 2 streets/delayed cbeting.

45 does not have enough high card value to be in your UTG+1 range. around 67 is the tweener spot.

You really shouldn't be 3 betting QJs in CO against an UTG+1 raiser. It plays too well in single raised pots and is dominated too often by his calling range. This is not a hand you 3bet when you have a polarized range.

Using someone who folds 80% of hands to a 3bet in an example is silly since it becomes instantly profitable to 3bet ATC against that fold percentage.

In example 3, you say "both have reasonable fold to 3bets " but don't mention what a reasonable fold to 3bet is.

In an instructional book, don't use filler words like "probably". eg "I probably make it 18-20bb". If you don't take an action 100% of the time and have to use the word probably, explain why.

example 4. "reacts in "standard" fashion" what is standard?  Same sort of problem with that word as probably.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us